Bio-mass for me; we've already got more bio-degradeable garbage than we know what to do with. Just imagine how long it takes it to degrade before it's clean. Bio-mass will get rid of that and provide good energy. For those who are wondering, the degrating of bio matter does release carbon-dioxide. But modern facilities do have an oxygen converter. So, this would be a very friendly and effective energy-generation method. Other than that I'd choose nuclear power, the fusion style; it is effective, safe {safer than most think}, and releases very little heat or radiation to its surroundings. B.T.W., James, are you for fusion or fission?
__________________
Guess who I am talking about.
Hint, hint.
He loves useless petroleum...
He hates the European union.
He thinks he controls the world...
Turns out he's a real Republican terd.
He supports global warming... We should have seen that one coming.
He is a dumbass...
No wonder he had to pay just to get into class.
All the problems in the world today...
Republicans had to relate to it in some way.
THANK YOU, THANK YOU!
Peter Radanovic wrote: Bio-mass for me; we've already got more bio-degradeable garbage than we know what to do with. Just imagine how long it takes it to degrade before it's clean. Bio-mass will get rid of that and provide good energy. For those who are wondering, the degrating of bio matter does release carbon-dioxide. But modern facilities do have an oxygen converter. So, this would be a very friendly and effective energy-generation method. Other than that I'd choose nuclear power, the fusion style; it is effective, safe {safer than most think}, and releases very little heat or radiation to its surroundings. B.T.W., James, are you for fusion or fission?
For now, I'm going for fission. Fusion is A LONG ways off.
